In a significant legal confrontation, two California residents have filed a lawsuit against a major automobile corporation, alleging violations of consumer protection laws. On August 18, 2025, David and Katherine Rolefson initiated legal proceedings in the Superior Court of California, County of Santa Clara, against Porsche Cars North America Inc., accusing the company of breaching both express and implied warranties under the Song-Beverly Consumer Warranty Act.
The plaintiffs, David and Katherine Rolefson from Piedmont, California, claim that their 2021 Porsche Taycan has persistent defects that impair its use and safety. They argue that despite multiple repair attempts by authorized facilities, the vehicle remains non-compliant with the warranties provided at purchase. The complaint details that these defects were presented to Porsche’s repair facilities numerous times but were not resolved satisfactorily. As per the Song-Beverly Consumer Warranty Act, the plaintiffs assert they are entitled to restitution for their vehicle’s purchase price since Porsche failed to conform the vehicle to its express written warranties within a reasonable number of attempts or time frame.
The Rolefsons further allege that Porsche engaged in unfair business practices as defined by California Business and Professions Code § 17200. They accuse Porsche of knowingly selling vehicles with defective components and failing to adequately inform consumers about their warranty rights. The plaintiffs seek damages amounting to $171,231.00 alongside civil penalties twice their actual damages due to what they describe as willful non-compliance by Porsche. Additionally, they request attorney fees and other related expenses incurred during this legal battle.
The Rolefsons’ complaint also includes accusations under the “unlawful,” “unfair,” and “fraudulent” prongs of California’s Unfair Competition Law. They argue that Porsche’s actions were deceptive and misleading to consumers like themselves who relied on assurances regarding product quality and warranty coverage. Furthermore, they claim these practices have caused them irreparable harm without adequate remedy through monetary compensation alone.
Represented by Neal F. Morrow III from MES Legal Inc., based in Torrance, CA, and Ryan K. Marden from Marden Law Inc., located in Irvine, CA; the plaintiffs are determined to hold Porsche accountable for what they perceive as significant breaches of consumer trust and legal obligations.
The case is being presided over in the Superior Court of California under Case No.: 20CV472991 with Judge M. Bui overseeing proceedings.
Source: 25CV472991_David_Rolefson_v_Porsche_Cars_Complaint_County_of_Santa_Clara.pdf
