Plaintiffs Allege Pacific Clinics Engaged in Systemic Wage Violations and Discrimination

Santa Clara County Court House
Santa Clara County Court House
0Comments

The plaintiffs in a recent court filing have brought forward serious allegations against a prominent mental health services provider, claiming systemic discrimination and wage violations. On November 20, 2025, Clarissa Harwell and five other female former employees filed a complaint in the Superior Court of California, County of Santa Clara, against Pacific Clinics. The plaintiffs allege that they were subjected to sex discrimination and various labor law violations during their employment.

The lawsuit accuses Pacific Clinics of failing to pay overtime wages, minimum wages, and not providing mandated rest and meal periods as required by California labor laws. According to the complaint, the plaintiffs worked in dual roles as salaried employees and hourly “On-Call” consultants but were not compensated for all hours worked or at appropriate overtime rates. The complaint details how management allegedly instructed them to underreport hours worked, leading to significant financial losses for the plaintiffs. For instance, Harwell claims she was only paid for part of her “On-Call” hours despite working extensive shifts beyond her regular duties.

In addition to wage-related grievances, the plaintiffs argue that they faced sex discrimination as women within the organization. They claim that their male counterparts were not subjected to similar treatment regarding pay discrepancies and workload expectations. The lawsuit further alleges wrongful termination in retaliation for raising concerns about these issues with management.

The plaintiffs are seeking damages for unpaid wages, penalties for inaccurate wage statements, waiting time penalties due to delayed final payments upon termination, and compensation for emotional distress caused by discriminatory practices. They also demand a jury trial to address these grievances comprehensively.

Representing the plaintiffs are attorneys Matthew S. Da Vega and Matthew H. Fisher from Da Vega Fisher Mechtenberg LLP. The case is being overseen by Judge L. Ayala under Case #25CV480453.

Source: 25CV480453_Clarissa_Harwell_v_Pacific_Clinics_Complaint_County_of_Santa_Clara_California.pdf



Related

Patricia Guerrero, Chief justice of Judicial Branch of California

Judicial Council to consider mandatory reporting of civil arrests in court facilities

The Judicial Council plans to discuss making it mandatory for courts to report civil arrests within superior court facilities during its upcoming meeting. Other topics include reports on pretrial programs, gender inclusivity in jury processes, counsel appointments in capital cases, and expanding access to justice.

Rob Bonta, California Attorney General

Court halts Nexstar and Tegna merger after request from Attorney General Bonta

A federal court has temporarily blocked the merger between Tegna Inc. and Nexstar Media Group following requests from Attorney General Rob Bonta and other states’ attorneys general. The move aims to address concerns over media consolidation’s impact on local news coverage.

Rob Bonta, California Attorney General

Attorney General Bonta joins coalition opposing CFPB draft strategic plan for 2026-2030

California Attorney General Rob Bonta joined a coalition opposing proposed changes at the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB). The group argues these changes could weaken consumer protections nationwide.

Trending

The Weekly Newsletter

Sign-up for the Weekly Newsletter from California Courts Daily.