Plaintiff alleges major car manufacturer breached warranty under Lemon Law

Superior Court of California - Santa Clara County
Superior Court of California - Santa Clara County
0Comments

In a legal battle that highlights the ongoing challenges consumers face with vehicle warranties, a lawsuit has been filed against a major car manufacturer over allegations of selling a defective vehicle. On November 10, 2025, Thi Thanh Truc Thai filed a complaint in the Superior Court of California, County of Santa Clara, against Kia America, Inc., alleging violations related to the Song-Beverly Consumer Warranty Act.

The case revolves around a 2025 Kia K5 purchased by Thai from Kia of Stockton on July 7, 2024. The plaintiff claims that shortly after purchase, significant defects emerged in the vehicle’s transmission system and other safety-related components. According to the complaint, despite multiple repair attempts under warranty at authorized dealerships, these issues remain unresolved. “The vehicle has remained out of service since October 3, 2025,” the complaint states, underscoring the severity and persistence of the problems.

Under California’s Lemon Law Presumption, vehicles are considered lemons if they have been repaired multiple times for substantial defects or have been out of service for more than 30 days cumulatively. Thai argues that her vehicle meets these criteria and is thus entitled to remedies under the law. The Song-Beverly Consumer Warranty Act mandates that manufacturers either replace defective vehicles or refund buyers when they fail to conform to express warranties after reasonable repair attempts.

Thai’s lawsuit accuses Kia America of breaching both express and implied warranties associated with her vehicle purchase. The complaint outlines how these breaches have impaired the use and value of her car significantly. Furthermore, it alleges that Kia failed to maintain adequate repair facilities within California and did not fulfill its warranty obligations as required by law.

In addition to seeking compensatory damages exceeding $35,000 for breach of warranty claims, Thai demands restitution for all expenses incurred due to these defects. She also seeks civil penalties against Kia for willful non-compliance with warranty obligations and reimbursement for attorney fees and litigation costs.

Representing Thai is attorney David Byan Zand from Zand Law APC based in Los Angeles. The case is presided over by Judge Y. Chavez under Case No. 25CV479770.

Source: 25CV479770_Thi_Thanh_v_Kia_America_Complaint_County_of_Santa_Clara_California.pdf



Related

Patricia Guerrero, Chief justice of Judicial Branch of California

Judicial Council to consider mandatory reporting of civil arrests in court facilities

The Judicial Council plans to discuss making it mandatory for courts to report civil arrests within superior court facilities during its upcoming meeting. Other topics include reports on pretrial programs, gender inclusivity in jury processes, counsel appointments in capital cases, and expanding access to justice.

Rob Bonta, California Attorney General

Court halts Nexstar and Tegna merger after request from Attorney General Bonta

A federal court has temporarily blocked the merger between Tegna Inc. and Nexstar Media Group following requests from Attorney General Rob Bonta and other states’ attorneys general. The move aims to address concerns over media consolidation’s impact on local news coverage.

Rob Bonta, California Attorney General

Attorney General Bonta joins coalition opposing CFPB draft strategic plan for 2026-2030

California Attorney General Rob Bonta joined a coalition opposing proposed changes at the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB). The group argues these changes could weaken consumer protections nationwide.

Trending

The Weekly Newsletter

Sign-up for the Weekly Newsletter from California Courts Daily.