Plaintiff alleges food distributor violated labor laws

Plaintiff alleges food distributor violated labor laws
Superior Court of California Sacramento County — Official Website
0Comments

A California worker has taken legal action against a food wholesale and distribution company, alleging a range of labor violations. On September 4, 2025, Celestino Rodriguez filed a class-action complaint in the Superior Court of California for the County of Sacramento against Win Woo Trading, LLC. The lawsuit accuses the company of failing to pay minimum and overtime wages, not providing required meal and rest breaks, issuing inaccurate wage statements, and other violations under various sections of the California Labor Code.

According to the complaint, Rodriguez worked as an hourly-paid driver for Win Woo Trading from November 2024 to January 2025. He claims that during his employment, he was subjected to unlawful timekeeping practices that resulted in unpaid wages. “Defendants required Plaintiff and other non-exempt employees to perform work before their scheduled shifts, after their scheduled shifts, and/or during off-the-clock meal breaks,” states the complaint. Additionally, Rodriguez alleges that Win Woo Trading failed to provide legally compliant meal periods and rest breaks due to work demands imposed by the company.

The lawsuit further contends that Win Woo Trading did not reimburse necessary business expenses incurred by employees using personal cell phones for work-related communications and GPS navigation. Rodriguez asserts that these actions violate several provisions of the California Labor Code, including sections related to minimum wage (1182.12), overtime (510), meal periods (226.7), rest periods (516), wage statements (226), waiting time penalties (201-203), expense reimbursement (2802), and unfair competition under Business & Professions Code § 17200.

Rodriguez is seeking class certification for multiple classes of affected employees who experienced similar treatment over the past four years. The relief sought includes unpaid wages with interest, statutory penalties, attorneys’ fees, costs of suit, restitution for unfair competition practices, and injunctive relief against further violations. “The nature of this action makes the class action format a particularly efficient procedure to redress the violations alleged herein,” argues Rodriguez’s legal team.

Representing Rodriguez are attorneys William C. Sung, Tiffany L. Luu, and Joseph C. Ramli from Justice For Workers P.C., based in Westminster, CA. The case has been filed under Case No.: 2Siryrowe4dowws in front of an unspecified judge at this time.

Source: 25CV021018_Celestino_Rodriguez_v_Win_Woo_Complaint_County_of_Sacramento_California.pdf

Source: 25CV021018_Celestino_Rodriguez_v_Win_Woo_Complaint_County_of_Sacramento_California.pdf

Source: 25CV021018_Celestino_Rodriguez_v_Win_Woo_Complaint_County_of_Sacramento_California.pdf



Related

Patricia Guerrero, Chief justice of Judicial Branch of California

Judicial Council to consider mandatory reporting of civil arrests in court facilities

The Judicial Council plans to discuss making it mandatory for courts to report civil arrests within superior court facilities during its upcoming meeting. Other topics include reports on pretrial programs, gender inclusivity in jury processes, counsel appointments in capital cases, and expanding access to justice.

Rob Bonta, California Attorney General

Court halts Nexstar and Tegna merger after request from Attorney General Bonta

A federal court has temporarily blocked the merger between Tegna Inc. and Nexstar Media Group following requests from Attorney General Rob Bonta and other states’ attorneys general. The move aims to address concerns over media consolidation’s impact on local news coverage.

Rob Bonta, California Attorney General

Attorney General Bonta joins coalition opposing CFPB draft strategic plan for 2026-2030

California Attorney General Rob Bonta joined a coalition opposing proposed changes at the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB). The group argues these changes could weaken consumer protections nationwide.

Trending

The Weekly Newsletter

Sign-up for the Weekly Newsletter from California Courts Daily.