Plaintiff Alleges Discrimination Against Former Employer New Hope Dairy LLC Under FEHA

Sacramento County Superior Court
Sacramento County Superior Court
0Comments

In a gripping legal battle, a former employee has taken his case to the Superior Court of California, alleging severe workplace discrimination and wrongful termination. The complaint was filed by Yamazaky Soriano Michaca on February 18, 2026, against New Hope Dairy LLC in Sacramento County. This lawsuit shines a light on the alleged mistreatment faced by employees who require accommodations due to family medical issues.

The plaintiff, Yamazaky Soriano Michaca, claims that he was unjustly terminated from his position at New Hope Dairy LLC after requesting time off to care for his daughter diagnosed with a brain tumor. According to the complaint, filed by The Sentinel Firm APC attorneys Seung L. Yang and Brett M. Gunther, Michaca had been employed as a cow herder since December 2023. On July 26, 2025, he informed his employer about his need for leave under the California Family Rights Act (CFRA) to attend medical appointments with his daughter. However, instead of receiving support or accommodations, Michaca alleges he was told not to return to work and subsequently received notice of termination from the company’s owner.

Michaca’s lawsuit accuses New Hope Dairy LLC of multiple violations under the Fair Employment and Housing Act (FEHA), including discrimination based on associational disability and failure to engage in an interactive process for accommodation. The complaint also cites retaliation under both FEHA and CFRA for exercising his rights to family medical leave. “Defendants acted with oppression and/or malice,” states the lawsuit, emphasizing the emotional distress and financial losses suffered by Michaca due to what he describes as discriminatory practices.

The plaintiff is seeking various forms of relief from the court: general and compensatory damages for lost wages and benefits; punitive damages aimed at penalizing New Hope Dairy LLC for its alleged misconduct; reimbursement for attorney fees; and any applicable penalties under California law. Additionally, Michaca demands compensation for emotional distress caused by what he describes as “outrageous” conduct by his former employer.

Representing Michaca are attorneys Seung L. Yang and Brett M. Gunther from The Sentinel Firm APC based in Los Angeles. The case is being heard in Sacramento County’s Superior Court under Case No. 2ecOOs74g.

Source: 26CV003749_Yamazaky_Soriano_v_New_Hope_Complaint_County_of_Sacramento_California.pdf


Related

Patricia Guerrero, Chief justice of Judicial Branch of California

Judicial Council to consider mandatory reporting of civil arrests in court facilities

The Judicial Council plans to discuss making it mandatory for courts to report civil arrests within superior court facilities during its upcoming meeting. Other topics include reports on pretrial programs, gender inclusivity in jury processes, counsel appointments in capital cases, and expanding access to justice.

Rob Bonta, California Attorney General

Court halts Nexstar and Tegna merger after request from Attorney General Bonta

A federal court has temporarily blocked the merger between Tegna Inc. and Nexstar Media Group following requests from Attorney General Rob Bonta and other states’ attorneys general. The move aims to address concerns over media consolidation’s impact on local news coverage.

Rob Bonta, California Attorney General

Attorney General Bonta joins coalition opposing CFPB draft strategic plan for 2026-2030

California Attorney General Rob Bonta joined a coalition opposing proposed changes at the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB). The group argues these changes could weaken consumer protections nationwide.

Trending

The Weekly Newsletter

Sign-up for the Weekly Newsletter from California Courts Daily.