A construction company is facing serious allegations of labor law violations, including unpaid wages and failure to provide adequate breaks. On February 18, 2026, Michelle Lopez filed a class action complaint in the Superior Court of California, County of Sacramento, against Sundt Construction, Inc., along with its Southern and Northern California branches. The lawsuit claims that the company engaged in a pattern of wage abuse affecting Lopez and other similarly situated employees.
Michelle Lopez, who worked as a Project Administrator for Sundt Construction from January 2020 to March 2025, alleges that the company systematically failed to pay minimum wages and overtime compensation. According to the complaint, employees were often required to work “off-the-clock” without proper compensation. This included performing tasks before clocking in or after clocking out and working during meal periods without receiving appropriate break premiums. “Defendants knew or should have known that they had a duty to compensate Plaintiff,” states the complaint, accusing Sundt Construction of willfully neglecting their obligations under California labor laws.
The lawsuit also accuses Sundt Construction of failing to provide accurate wage statements and not reimbursing necessary business expenses incurred by employees. These alleged violations extend beyond just monetary concerns; they reflect broader issues of employee rights and fair treatment in the workplace. The plaintiff argues that these practices constitute unfair business operations under California’s Business & Professions Code § 17200 et seq., which prohibits unlawful business acts.
Lopez seeks several forms of relief from the court on behalf of herself and other affected employees. These include certification of the lawsuit as a class action, appointment as class representative, restitution for unpaid wages, statutory penalties for labor code violations, and reimbursement for business expenses. Additionally, she demands injunctive relief to prevent further violations by Sundt Construction. The complaint emphasizes that these remedies are essential not only for compensating affected workers but also for upholding public policy objectives related to employment rights.
Representing Michelle Lopez are attorneys Megan E. Ross and Adam Witkin from Abramson Labor Group. The case has been assigned Case No. 2am oosS885 in the Superior Court of California for the County of Sacramento.
Source: 26CV003885_Michelle_Lopez_v_Sundt_Construction_Complaint_County_of_Sacramento_California.pdf
