A California resident has taken legal action against a major automobile manufacturer, alleging serious violations of consumer protection laws. On November 4, 2025, Daniel Kane filed a complaint in the Superior Court of California, County of Santa Clara, against Nissan North America Inc., accusing the company of failing to honor express and implied warranties on a vehicle he purchased.
The case revolves around a 2019 Nissan Leaf EV that Kane acquired on September 17, 2021. According to the complaint, Kane claims that the vehicle exhibited numerous defects and malfunctions that impaired its use, value, and safety. Despite multiple repair attempts at authorized facilities, Nissan allegedly failed to rectify these issues or replace the vehicle as required by law. Kane’s lawsuit cites breaches of the Song-Beverly Consumer Warranty Act and violations of California Business and Professions Code § 17200.
Kane asserts that Nissan’s actions were willful and intentional. He accuses the company of knowingly selling defective vehicles to consumers without proper disclosure. “Defendants had actual knowledge of the Vehicle’s defects,” states the complaint, emphasizing that Nissan repeatedly refused necessary repairs or compensation. The plaintiff argues this conduct constitutes unlawful business practices under California law.
In his pursuit for justice, Kane seeks several forms of relief from the court. He requests rescission of the sales contract and restitution for all payments made towards the vehicle’s purchase price. Additionally, he demands actual damages amounting to $23,335.68 along with consequential damages as proven at trial. The lawsuit also calls for civil penalties under the Song-Beverly Act—potentially doubling actual damages—and coverage for attorney fees incurred during litigation.
Represented by Natalee Fisher from MFS Legal Inc., Kane is determined to hold Nissan accountable not only for financial restitution but also through injunctive measures aimed at preventing further unfair competition practices by enforcing compliance with consumer protection statutes throughout California’s marketplace.
This legal battle will unfold before Judge A. Hernandez in case number 25CV479317 as both parties prepare their arguments over what could be precedent-setting interpretations regarding warranty obligations within automotive industries across state lines.
Source: 25CV479317_Daniel_Kane_v_Nissan_North_Complaint_County_of_Santa_Clara_California.pdf
