Plaintiff accuses major bank over alleged unfair competition and contract breaches

Superior Court of California Sacramento County
Superior Court of California Sacramento County
0Comments

A Sacramento resident is embroiled in a legal battle against a major national bank, accusing it of unfair competition and breach of contract that led to the collapse of his business. Tobias Maurice Scott filed a complaint on November 3, 2025, in the Superior Court of California, County of Sacramento, against Bank of America, N.A., alleging multiple violations including unlawful seizure of funds and breach of implied covenant.

The case centers around an incident from November 2, 2021, when Scott’s business account at Bank of America received $350,000 in federal aid through the Small Business Administration’s Economic Injury Disaster Loan program. The very next day, Bank of America executed a levy and seized $253,567.17 from this account without prior notice or opportunity for Scott to contest the action. This levy was based on a default judgment obtained by Spark Funding LLC in New York, which Scott claims he was never personally served with nor informed about by the bank.

Scott argues that Bank of America improperly applied New York law instead of California’s consumer protection laws during the garnishment process. He states that this oversight resulted in catastrophic financial damage: his notary signing agency was forced to close immediately due to lack of operating capital. The complaint highlights how Scott’s monthly income plummeted from approximately $25,000 to zero overnight.

Despite efforts to resolve the situation—including demand letters and complaints filed with regulatory bodies—Bank of America’s responses were dismissive. A pivotal moment came when the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) issued a Consent Order against Bank of America for similar practices affecting thousands across various states. The CFPB found that the bank systematically failed to apply state-specific consumer protections during out-of-state garnishments.

Scott seeks restitution for damages exceeding $35,000 as well as injunctive relief to prevent further unlawful practices by Bank of America. His claims include violation under California’s Unfair Competition Law (Business & Professions Code §17200), breach of written contract, breach of implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing, and requests declaratory relief.

Representing Scott is attorney James L. Arrasmith from The Law Offices of James L. Arrasmith based in Fair Oaks, CA. The case is being overseen by Judge B. Delira under Case No.: # HB SSS.

Source: 25CV026353_Tobias_Maurice_v_Bank_of_America _Complaint_County_of_Sacramento_California.pdf



Related

Patricia Guerrero, Chief justice of Judicial Branch of California

Judicial Council to consider mandatory reporting of civil arrests in court facilities

The Judicial Council plans to discuss making it mandatory for courts to report civil arrests within superior court facilities during its upcoming meeting. Other topics include reports on pretrial programs, gender inclusivity in jury processes, counsel appointments in capital cases, and expanding access to justice.

Rob Bonta, California Attorney General

Court halts Nexstar and Tegna merger after request from Attorney General Bonta

A federal court has temporarily blocked the merger between Tegna Inc. and Nexstar Media Group following requests from Attorney General Rob Bonta and other states’ attorneys general. The move aims to address concerns over media consolidation’s impact on local news coverage.

Rob Bonta, California Attorney General

Attorney General Bonta joins coalition opposing CFPB draft strategic plan for 2026-2030

California Attorney General Rob Bonta joined a coalition opposing proposed changes at the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB). The group argues these changes could weaken consumer protections nationwide.

Trending

The Weekly Newsletter

Sign-up for the Weekly Newsletter from California Courts Daily.