Former Employee Alleges Wage Violations Against Capital City Auto Auction

Superior Court of California Sacramento County
Superior Court of California Sacramento County
0Comments

Marla Garrett, a former employee of Capital City Auto Auction, Inc., has filed a class-action lawsuit against her former employer, alleging numerous violations of California labor laws. The complaint was filed on February 24, 2026, in the Superior Court of California, County of Sacramento. Garrett accuses Capital City Auto Auction, Inc. of failing to provide meal and rest periods, not paying all wages due, and other labor code violations.

The lawsuit claims that for at least four years prior to the filing date, employees were systematically denied their legal rights to meal and rest breaks as stipulated by California Labor Code §§ 226.7, 512, and 558. According to the complaint, “Plaintiff and Defendant’s California employees were routinely unable…to take an uninterrupted 30-minute meal break for every shift they worked.” Additionally, Garrett alleges that employees were required to work off-the-clock without compensation for tasks performed before clocking in or after clocking out. This practice allegedly resulted in unpaid wages for both regular hours and overtime work.

Garrett’s complaint further asserts that Capital City Auto Auction failed to issue accurate wage statements as required by Labor Code § 226(a), which mandates employers to provide itemized wage statements detailing gross wages earned and total hours worked. The plaintiff contends that these omissions are knowing and intentional violations of the law.

Moreover, the lawsuit accuses the company of failing to reimburse employees for business expenses such as mileage incurred while performing tasks on behalf of the employer. Under Labor Code § 2802, employers are required to indemnify employees for necessary expenditures related to their job duties.

Garrett is seeking compensatory damages including lost wages and benefits along with penalties under various sections of the California Labor Code. She also requests attorney fees and costs associated with bringing this action forward. In addition to monetary compensation, Garrett seeks injunctive relief requiring Capital City Auto Auction to comply with state labor laws moving forward.

Representing Marla Garrett is Roman Otkupman from Otkupman Law Firm located in Westlake Village, CA. The case has been assigned Case No. 2B-004377 in the Superior Court of California County of Sacramento.

Source: 26CV004377_Marla_Garrett_v_Capital_City_Auto_Complaint_County_of_Sacramento_California.pdf


Related

Patricia Guerrero, Chief justice of Judicial Branch of California

Judicial Council to consider mandatory reporting of civil arrests in court facilities

The Judicial Council plans to discuss making it mandatory for courts to report civil arrests within superior court facilities during its upcoming meeting. Other topics include reports on pretrial programs, gender inclusivity in jury processes, counsel appointments in capital cases, and expanding access to justice.

Rob Bonta, California Attorney General

Court halts Nexstar and Tegna merger after request from Attorney General Bonta

A federal court has temporarily blocked the merger between Tegna Inc. and Nexstar Media Group following requests from Attorney General Rob Bonta and other states’ attorneys general. The move aims to address concerns over media consolidation’s impact on local news coverage.

Rob Bonta, California Attorney General

Attorney General Bonta joins coalition opposing CFPB draft strategic plan for 2026-2030

California Attorney General Rob Bonta joined a coalition opposing proposed changes at the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB). The group argues these changes could weaken consumer protections nationwide.

Trending

The Weekly Newsletter

Sign-up for the Weekly Newsletter from California Courts Daily.