Former Employee Alleges Stucco Contractor Failed To Pay Overtime And Provide Breaks

Superior Court of California Sacramento County
Superior Court of California Sacramento County
0Comments

A stucco contractor in Sacramento, California is facing a class-action lawsuit for alleged violations of labor laws, including failure to pay overtime and provide adequate meal and rest breaks. Alfredo Virgen-Navarrete filed the complaint against Future Plastering, Inc. on November 17, 2025, in the Superior Court of California, County of Sacramento.

The lawsuit accuses Future Plastering, Inc., a company specializing in plastering services for residential and business customers, of systemic illegal employment practices that violate multiple sections of the California Labor Code. The plaintiff claims that the company failed to pay employees for all hours worked, did not provide compliant meal and rest periods, and failed to issue accurate wage statements. “Defendant does not properly record nor compensate Plaintiff and other non-exempt employees for the overtime they are owed,” states the complaint. Additionally, it alleges that terminated employees were not paid their due wages promptly.

Virgen-Navarrete argues that he was required to work beyond his scheduled hours without proper compensation. He also claims that he was often forced to skip or cut short his meal breaks due to work demands. “During his five years with the company, Plaintiff was only provided one 45-minute meal break per shift,” the document details. The lawsuit further asserts that Future Plastering’s practices constitute unfair competition under California’s Business & Professions Code.

The plaintiff seeks various forms of relief from the court. These include compensatory damages for unpaid wages and penalties for violations of labor laws. The lawsuit also requests an order requiring Future Plastering to audit its payroll records to determine restitution amounts owed to current and former employees. Furthermore, Virgen-Navarrete seeks injunctive relief to prevent ongoing violations and attorney’s fees.

Represented by Marcus J. Bradley and Kiley L. Grombacher from Bradley/Grombacher LLP, Virgen-Navarrete demands a jury trial for this case (Case No: 4S OS Po 1o). The complaint was electronically filed by Deputy B. Singh in the Superior Court of California.

Source: 25CV027810_Alfredo_Virgen_v_Future_Plastering_Complaint_County_of_Sacramento.pdf



Related

Santa Clara County Superior Court

Couple Accuses Medical Professionals at Fremont Surgery Center of Malpractice Leading to Cardiac Arrest

A Monterey County couple has filed a lawsuit against two doctors and Fremont Ambulatory Surgery Center for alleged medical malpractice resulting in cardiac arrest during surgery.

Sacramento County Superior Court

Plaintiff Alleges Former Employer Paramount Lender Solutions Engaged in Discrimination and Retaliation

Adam Lamb Sr., represented by CAL LAW APC’s Calvin Chang, has filed a lawsuit against Paramount Lender Solutions LLC alleging discrimination based on disability and retaliatory termination following reports of sexual harassment at work.

Santa Clara County Superior Court

Ralph Robles appointed judge for Santa Clara County Superior Court

Commissioner Ralph Robles has been appointed as a judge of the Superior Court of California, County of Santa Clara.

Trending

The Weekly Newsletter

Sign-up for the Weekly Newsletter from California Courts Daily.