Former Employee Alleges Discrimination by Composites Company Over Cannabis Use

Santa Clara County Superior Court
Santa Clara County Superior Court
0Comments

Robert Gomez, a former employee of a major composites company, has filed a class action lawsuit alleging systemic discrimination against employees who use cannabis legally outside of work. On February 23, 2026, Gomez lodged the complaint in the Superior Court of California for the County of Santa Clara against Toray Advanced Composites ADS, LLC. The case underscores ongoing tensions between evolving cannabis laws and workplace policies.

Gomez’s lawsuit accuses Toray Advanced Composites ADS, LLC of violating California Government Code § 12954 and the Fair Employment and Housing Act (FEHA). According to Gomez, the company discriminated against employees based on their lawful off-duty cannabis use. The complaint alleges that Toray enforced an unlawful drug-testing policy that disproportionately affected employees like Gomez, who tested positive for non-psychoactive cannabis metabolites during employer-mandated drug screenings. These tests do not measure impairment but rather detect past cannabis use through urine samples. “Defendants have acted intentionally and with deliberate indifference,” Gomez claims in his filing.

The plaintiff was employed as a warehouse clerk from January 2024 until April 2025 when he was terminated following a positive drug test for THCA—a non-psychoactive metabolite of THC. This dismissal occurred despite no evidence of workplace impairment or misconduct related to cannabis use. The complaint highlights how such policies can unjustly penalize employees who engage in legal activities outside work hours. By filing this lawsuit on behalf of himself and other similarly affected employees, Gomez seeks to challenge these practices under California law.

Gomez is pursuing several forms of relief from the court: compensatory damages for lost wages and benefits; economic damages; injunctive relief to prevent further enforcement of these discriminatory policies; and attorneys’ fees under California’s Business and Professions Code §§ 17200 et seq., which prohibits unfair business practices. He also requests certification as a class representative for all current and former employees subjected to similar treatment since January 1, 2024.

Representing Robert Gomez are attorneys Fawn F. Bekam, Jacquelyn Silva, and Desiree Ruiz Alfaro from Abramson Labor Group based in Burbank, CA. The case is presided over by Judge M. Suarez under Case ID #26CV487687.

Source: 26CV487687_Robert_Gomez_v_Toray_Advanced_Complaint_County_of_Santa_Clara_California.pdf


Related

Patricia Guerrero, Chief justice of Judicial Branch of California

Judicial Council to consider mandatory reporting of civil arrests in court facilities

The Judicial Council plans to discuss making it mandatory for courts to report civil arrests within superior court facilities during its upcoming meeting. Other topics include reports on pretrial programs, gender inclusivity in jury processes, counsel appointments in capital cases, and expanding access to justice.

Rob Bonta, California Attorney General

Court halts Nexstar and Tegna merger after request from Attorney General Bonta

A federal court has temporarily blocked the merger between Tegna Inc. and Nexstar Media Group following requests from Attorney General Rob Bonta and other states’ attorneys general. The move aims to address concerns over media consolidation’s impact on local news coverage.

Rob Bonta, California Attorney General

Attorney General Bonta joins coalition opposing CFPB draft strategic plan for 2026-2030

California Attorney General Rob Bonta joined a coalition opposing proposed changes at the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB). The group argues these changes could weaken consumer protections nationwide.

Trending

The Weekly Newsletter

Sign-up for the Weekly Newsletter from California Courts Daily.