Former Employee Alleges Age Discrimination Against Healthcare Management Company

Santa Clara County Court House - Official Website
Santa Clara County Court House - Official Website
0Comments

A former employee has filed a lawsuit against her previous employer, alleging age discrimination and wrongful termination. On November 13, 2025, Maria Bejarano filed a complaint in the Superior Court of California, County of Santa Clara, against Elevate PFS Holdings, Inc., claiming that she was unfairly dismissed due to her age and in retaliation for raising concerns about workplace conditions.

Maria Bejarano’s complaint outlines several grievances against Elevate PFS Holdings, Inc., a Delaware corporation operating in Santa Clara County. Bejarano worked as a Supervisor from May 1, 2022, until her termination on August 5, 2024. Her role involved managing patient advocates across Northern California and required extensive travel between hospitals. Despite her supervisory position, she was subjected to the same quota requirements as the hourly employees she managed. Bejarano alleges that she faced disciplinary actions for not meeting these quotas despite having additional responsibilities such as training new employees and covering for absent staff at multiple locations.

The complaint further details how Bejarano repeatedly requested assistance from management due to being overwhelmed with duties but received no support. She also reported inadequate training and hostile behavior from her Regional Director, Netty Estrada. After voicing these concerns, Bejarano claims that Estrada’s behavior became increasingly adversarial. She observed that younger employees under Estrada’s supervision were not disciplined for infractions while she faced progressive disciplinary actions leading up to her termination.

Bejarano argues that her dismissal was based on age discrimination and retaliation for reporting workplace issues. At the time of her termination at fifty-six years old, she was one of the oldest employees in her region and believes she was replaced by a younger worker. The lawsuit cites violations of the Fair Employment and Housing Act (FEHA), California Labor Code Section 1102.5 regarding retaliation, failure to prevent harassment or discrimination, and wrongful termination in violation of public policy.

In seeking justice through this legal action, Bejarano requests compensatory damages for lost wages and emotional distress caused by the alleged discrimination and retaliation. She also seeks punitive damages due to what she describes as malicious conduct by Elevate PFS Holdings’ management team. Additionally, Bejarano is pursuing statutory penalties along with reasonable attorney’s fees.

Representing Maria Bejarano are attorneys Chong Roh and Terry S. Park from Attain Law Corporation based in Woodland Hills, California. The case is filed under Case No.: 25CV480003 in the Superior Court of California with Judge Y. Chave overseeing proceedings.

Source: 25CV480003_Maria_Bejarano_v_Elevate_Holdings_Complaint_County_of_Santa_Clara_California.pdf



Related

Rob Bonta, California Attorney General

Attorney General Bonta releases evidence of Amazon price fixing in California case

California Attorney General Rob Bonta has released evidence alleging that Amazon coordinated illegal price increases across major retail platforms. The unredacted court filing reveals detailed examples of alleged collusion among retailers such as Walmart, Chewy, Target and others at consumers’ expense.

Todd W. Robinson, U.S. District Judge

Chinese national pleads guilty in $65 million fraud scheme targeting seniors across U.S.

Ziyue Zhao has pleaded guilty in federal court for his role in a $65 million fraud ring targeting elderly Americans nationwide. The multi-agency investigation revealed sophisticated schemes involving fake identities and international cooperation between crime networks.

Laurie M. Earl, Administrative Presiding Justice

Third Appellate District announces plan to destroy old civil court records

The Third Appellate District has announced plans to destroy certain old civil court records unless a valid reason for retention is provided by May 6. Those wishing to retain specific cases must contact the Assistant Clerk/Executive Officer with detailed reasons.

Trending

The Weekly Newsletter

Sign-up for the Weekly Newsletter from California Courts Daily.